Fiabilismo Robusto de virtudes colectivas

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as
Dani Pino
Sección
Sección Monográfica I
Palabras clave:
Collective Epistemology; Epistemic Agency; Epistemology; Group Epistemology; Reliabilism; Social Epistemology; Virtue Reliabilism. Agencia Epistémica; Epistemología; Epistemología Colectiva; Epistemología de Grupos; Epistemología Social; Fiabilismo; Fiabilismo de Virtudes.
Resumen

 En la epistemología contemporánea, dos influyentes corrientes han evolucionado en paralelo: el fiabilismo de virtudes y la epistemología colectiva o de grupos. Pese a los intentos por integrar ambas (Carter, 2022; Đorđević y Berber, 2025; Greco, 2021; Harris, 2025; Jarczewski, 2024; Jarczewski y Riggs, 2025; Palermos, 2022; Palermos y Pritchard, 2016), la versión más robusta del fiabilismo de virtudes (Sosa, 1991, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2015, 2021), ofrece una doble resistencia a dicho proyecto. Por un lado, niega su compatibilidad con la epistemología colectiva (Sosa, 2007, pp. 94-95); por otro, reduce esta última a un caso marginal dentro del propio marco sosiano (Kallestrup, 2020). Este artículo analiza las condiciones que sustentan ambas estrategias—identificadas como Incompatibilidad y Excepcionalidad— para someterlas a revisión crítica desde una alternativa positiva, Compatibilidad, que busca mostrar cómo la noción de virtud epistémica puede extenderse de manera coherente a agentes irreductiblemente colectivos. El resultado es una propuesta de fiabilismo de virtudes colectivas robusto, capaz de reconciliar la normatividad individual y la grupal sin sacrificar el realismo epistémico propio del modelo de Sosa.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar

Fiabilismo Robusto de virtudes colectivas . (2026). Cuadernos Salmantinos De filosofía, 53, 169-202. https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-9509.53.169

Citas

Bengson, J., & Moffett, M. A. (2011). Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford University Press USA.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389364.001.0001

Bird, A. (2010). Social Knowing: The Social Sense of ‘Scientific Knowledge’. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1), 23–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00184.x

Broncano-Berrocal, F. (2025). Pluralistic Summativism About Group Belief. En J. Lackey y A. McGlynn (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.6

Carter, J. A. (2022). Collective (Telic) Virtue Epistemology. En M. Alfano, C. Klein, y J. D. Ridder (Eds), Social Virtue Epistemology (pp. 335–356). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808952-45

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Đorđević, S., y Berber, A. (2025). The Criteria for the Emergence of Collective Epistemic Traits. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu, 32(3), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2025.32305

Dragos, C. (2019). Groups Can Know How. American Philosophical Quarterly, 56(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/48570635

Faria, D. (2021). Group Belief: Defending a Minimal Version of Summativism. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158111

Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121-123. Vol. 53, 2026, 169-202 ISSN: 0210-4857, E-ISSN: 2660-9509 https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121

Gilbert, M. (1987/1992). On Social Facts. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214627

Gilbert, M. (2002). Acting Together. En G. Meggle (Ed.), Social Facts & Collective Intentionality. Dr. Hänsel-Hohenhausen.

Gilbert, M. (2004). Collective Epistemology. Episteme, 1(2), 95-107. http://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2004.1.2.95

Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. Oxford University Press. ttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.001.0001

Gilbert, M. (2023). Life in Groups: How We Think, Feel, and Act Together. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847157.001.0001

Goldberg, S. (2009). The Social Virtues: Two Accounts. Acta Analytica, 24(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-009-0059-z

Goldberg, S. (2010). Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593248.001.0001

Goldman, A. (1987). Foundations of social epistemics. Synthese, 73(1), 109–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485444

Goldman, A. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238207.001.0001

Goldman, A. (2010). Why Social Epistemology is Real Epistemology. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Social Epistemology (pp. 1–29). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577477.003.0001

Goldman, A., y Whitcomb, D. (2010). Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press.

Graf, S., & Dang, H. (2025). Divergence Arguments in Collective Epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 20(6), e70045. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70045

Greco, J. (2021). The Transmission of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560818

Harris, K. R. (2025). Social virtue epistemology and epistemic exactingness. Episteme, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2024.41

Jarczewski, D. (2024). Generous Virtues: Rethinking the Value of Intellectual Virtues in Social Terms. Ad Americam, 25, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.12797/AdAmericam.25.2024.25.03

Jarczewski, D., y Riggs, W. D. (2025). Socializing Virtue Epistemology. Episteme, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2025.10

Kallestrup, J. (2020). Group virtue epistemology. Synthese, 197(12), 5233–5251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1225-7

Kusch, M. (2002). Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251223.001.0001

Lackey, J. (2021). The Epistemology of Groups. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199656608.001.0001

Lahroodi, R. (2007). Collective Epistemic Virtues. Social Epistemology, 21(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720701674122

List, C., y Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001

Longino, H. E. (2006). Philosophy of Science after the Social Turn. En M. C. Galavotti (Ed.), Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle (pp. 167–177). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4101-2_11

Navarro, J., y Pino, D. (2021). Deslimitando a Sosa: Diacronía y Colectividad del Juicio Doxástico. En M. Gómez-Alonso & D. Pérez-Chico, (Eds.), Ernesto Sosa: Conocimiento y Virtud (pp. 211-244). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.

Navarro, J., y Pino, D. (2024). The boundaries of gnoseology. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02205-8

Palermos, S. O. (2016). The Dynamics of Group Cognition. Minds and Machines, 26(4), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-016-9402-5

Palermos, S. O. (2022). Collaborative Knowledge: Where the Distributed and Commitment Models Merge. Synthese, 200(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03459-7

Palermos, S. O., y Pritchard, D. (2016). The Distribution of Epistemic Agency. En P. J. Reider (Ed.), Social Epistemology and Epistemic Agency: De-Centralizing Epistemic Agency (pp. 109–126). Rowan & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798881813000.ch-007

Palermos, S. O., y Tollefsen, D. P. (2018). Group Know-How. En J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Socially Extended Epistemology (pp. 112-131). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801764.003.0007

Pino, D. (2021). Group (epistemic) competence. Synthese, 199, 11377-11396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03294-2

Pino, D. (2025). Competencia, Seguridad y Situación en el Fiabilismo de Virtudes. Teorema. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 44(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30827/trif.32916

Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson & Co. Quinton, A. (1976). “Social Objects”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76, 1–27.

Schmitt, F. (1994). The justification of group beliefs. En F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge (pp. 257-287). Rowan & Littlefield.

Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001

Sosa, E. (2009). Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217250.001.0001

Sosa, E. (2010). How Competence Matters in Epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00200.x

Sosa, E. (2011). Knowing Full Well. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836918

Sosa, E. (2014). Con pleno conocimiento (M. Gómez-Alonso, Trad). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.

Sosa, E. (2015). Judgment & Agency. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719694.001.0001

Sosa, E. (2017). Epistemology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883059

Sosa, E. (2018). Una epistemología de virtudes. Creencia apta y conocimiento reflexivo (vol. 1) (J. J. Colomina Almiñana, Trad.). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.

Sosa, E. (2021). Epistemic Explanations: A Theory of Telic Normativity, and What it Explains. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198856467.001.0001

Sosa, E. (2023). Juicio y Agencia (M. Gómez-Alonso, Trad.). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.

Stanley, J. (2011). Knowing (How). Noûs, 45(2), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00758.x

Stanley, J., y Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy, 98(8), 411–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678403

Tollefsen, D. (2002). Challenging Epistemic Individualism. ProtoSociology, 16, 86–117. https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology20021622

Tollefsen, D. P. (2003). Rejecting Rejectionism. ProtoSociology, 18, 389-405. https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology200318/1916

Tollefsen, D. (2004). Collective Epistemic Agency. Southwest Philosophy Review, 20(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview20042015

Tollefsen, D. P. (2006). From extended mind to collective mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2-3), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2006.01.001

Tollefsen, D. (2011). Groups as Rational Sources. En H. B. Schmid, D. Sirtes, y M. Weber (Eds.), Collective Epistemology (pp. 20–11). Ontos-Velag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110322583.11

Tollefsen, D. (2015). Groups as Agents. Polity.

Tuomela, R. (1992). Group beliefs. Synthese, 91(3), 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413570

Tuomela, R. (2007). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001

Tuomela, R., y Miller, K. (1985). We-Intentions and Social Action. Analyse & Kritik, 7(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1985-0102

Winsberg, E. (2018). Philosophy and Climate Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108164290

Wray, K. B. (2001). Collective Belief and Acceptance. Synthese, 129(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013148515033

Artículos similares

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.