Robust collective virtue reliabilism

Main Article Content

Authors
Dani Pino
Section
Monographic Section
Keywords:
Collective Epistemology; Epistemic Agency; Epistemology; Group Epistemology; Reliabilism; Social Epistemology; Virtue Reliabilism. Agencia Epistémica; Epistemología; Epistemología Colectiva; Epistemología de Grupos; Epistemología Social; Fiabilismo; Fiabilismo de Virtudes.
Abstract

Two influential approaches in contemporary epistemology have largely developed in parallel: virtue reliabilism and group or collective epistemology. Although several attempts have been made to integrate these frameworks (Carter, 2022; Đorđević & Berber,
2025; Greco, 2021; Harris, 2025; Jarczewski, 2024; Jarczewski & Riggs, 2025; Palermos, 2022; Palermos y Pritchard 2016), the original formula in its robust version (Sosa, 1991, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2015, 2021)—offers a twofold resistance to such integration. It either denies the compatibility of virtue reliabilism with collective epistemology (Sosa, 2007, pp. 94-95) or construes the latter as a marginal case within Sosa’s own framework (Kallestrup, 2020). This paper examines the conditions that ground these two positions—here labelled Incompatibility and Excepcionality—and challenges both by advancing an alternative view, Compatibility. The proposed model of Robust Collective Virtue Reliabilism aims to show that epistemic virtues can be coherently attributed to irreducibly collective agents, thereby reconciling individual and group-level normativity without relinquishing the realist commitments of Sosa’s virtue epistemology.

Article Details

How to Cite

Robust collective virtue reliabilism. (2026). Cuadernos Salmantinos De filosofía, 53, 169-202. https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-9509.53.169

References

Bengson, J., & Moffett, M. A. (2011). Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford University Press USA.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389364.001.0001

Bird, A. (2010). Social Knowing: The Social Sense of ‘Scientific Knowledge’. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1), 23–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00184.x

Broncano-Berrocal, F. (2025). Pluralistic Summativism About Group Belief. En J. Lackey y A. McGlynn (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.6

Carter, J. A. (2022). Collective (Telic) Virtue Epistemology. En M. Alfano, C. Klein, y J. D. Ridder (Eds), Social Virtue Epistemology (pp. 335–356). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808952-45

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Đorđević, S., y Berber, A. (2025). The Criteria for the Emergence of Collective Epistemic Traits. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu, 32(3), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2025.32305

Dragos, C. (2019). Groups Can Know How. American Philosophical Quarterly, 56(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/48570635

Faria, D. (2021). Group Belief: Defending a Minimal Version of Summativism. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158111

Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121-123. Vol. 53, 2026, 169-202 ISSN: 0210-4857, E-ISSN: 2660-9509 https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121

Gilbert, M. (1987/1992). On Social Facts. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214627

Gilbert, M. (2002). Acting Together. En G. Meggle (Ed.), Social Facts & Collective Intentionality. Dr. Hänsel-Hohenhausen.

Gilbert, M. (2004). Collective Epistemology. Episteme, 1(2), 95-107. http://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2004.1.2.95

Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. Oxford University Press. ttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.001.0001

Gilbert, M. (2023). Life in Groups: How We Think, Feel, and Act Together. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847157.001.0001

Goldberg, S. (2009). The Social Virtues: Two Accounts. Acta Analytica, 24(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-009-0059-z

Goldberg, S. (2010). Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593248.001.0001

Goldman, A. (1987). Foundations of social epistemics. Synthese, 73(1), 109–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485444

Goldman, A. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238207.001.0001

Goldman, A. (2010). Why Social Epistemology is Real Epistemology. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Social Epistemology (pp. 1–29). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577477.003.0001

Goldman, A., y Whitcomb, D. (2010). Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press.

Graf, S., & Dang, H. (2025). Divergence Arguments in Collective Epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 20(6), e70045. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70045

Greco, J. (2021). The Transmission of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560818

Harris, K. R. (2025). Social virtue epistemology and epistemic exactingness. Episteme, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2024.41

Jarczewski, D. (2024). Generous Virtues: Rethinking the Value of Intellectual Virtues in Social Terms. Ad Americam, 25, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.12797/AdAmericam.25.2024.25.03

Jarczewski, D., y Riggs, W. D. (2025). Socializing Virtue Epistemology. Episteme, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2025.10

Kallestrup, J. (2020). Group virtue epistemology. Synthese, 197(12), 5233–5251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1225-7

Kusch, M. (2002). Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251223.001.0001

Lackey, J. (2021). The Epistemology of Groups. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199656608.001.0001

Lahroodi, R. (2007). Collective Epistemic Virtues. Social Epistemology, 21(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720701674122

List, C., y Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001

Longino, H. E. (2006). Philosophy of Science after the Social Turn. En M. C. Galavotti (Ed.), Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle (pp. 167–177). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4101-2_11

Navarro, J., y Pino, D. (2021). Deslimitando a Sosa: Diacronía y Colectividad del Juicio Doxástico. En M. Gómez-Alonso & D. Pérez-Chico, (Eds.), Ernesto Sosa: Conocimiento y Virtud (pp. 211-244). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.

Navarro, J., y Pino, D. (2024). The boundaries of gnoseology. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02205-8

Palermos, S. O. (2016). The Dynamics of Group Cognition. Minds and Machines, 26(4), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-016-9402-5

Palermos, S. O. (2022). Collaborative Knowledge: Where the Distributed and Commitment Models Merge. Synthese, 200(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03459-7

Palermos, S. O., y Pritchard, D. (2016). The Distribution of Epistemic Agency. En P. J. Reider (Ed.), Social Epistemology and Epistemic Agency: De-Centralizing Epistemic Agency (pp. 109–126). Rowan & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798881813000.ch-007

Palermos, S. O., y Tollefsen, D. P. (2018). Group Know-How. En J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Socially Extended Epistemology (pp. 112-131). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801764.003.0007

Pino, D. (2021). Group (epistemic) competence. Synthese, 199, 11377-11396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03294-2

Pino, D. (2025). Competencia, Seguridad y Situación en el Fiabilismo de Virtudes. Teorema. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 44(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30827/trif.32916

Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson & Co. Quinton, A. (1976). “Social Objects”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76, 1–27.

Schmitt, F. (1994). The justification of group beliefs. En F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge (pp. 257-287). Rowan & Littlefield.

Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001

Sosa, E. (2009). Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217250.001.0001

Sosa, E. (2010). How Competence Matters in Epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00200.x

Sosa, E. (2011). Knowing Full Well. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836918

Sosa, E. (2014). Con pleno conocimiento (M. Gómez-Alonso, Trad). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.

Sosa, E. (2015). Judgment & Agency. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719694.001.0001

Sosa, E. (2017). Epistemology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883059

Sosa, E. (2018). Una epistemología de virtudes. Creencia apta y conocimiento reflexivo (vol. 1) (J. J. Colomina Almiñana, Trad.). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.

Sosa, E. (2021). Epistemic Explanations: A Theory of Telic Normativity, and What it Explains. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198856467.001.0001

Sosa, E. (2023). Juicio y Agencia (M. Gómez-Alonso, Trad.). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.

Stanley, J. (2011). Knowing (How). Noûs, 45(2), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00758.x

Stanley, J., y Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy, 98(8), 411–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678403

Tollefsen, D. (2002). Challenging Epistemic Individualism. ProtoSociology, 16, 86–117. https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology20021622

Tollefsen, D. P. (2003). Rejecting Rejectionism. ProtoSociology, 18, 389-405. https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology200318/1916

Tollefsen, D. (2004). Collective Epistemic Agency. Southwest Philosophy Review, 20(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview20042015

Tollefsen, D. P. (2006). From extended mind to collective mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2-3), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2006.01.001

Tollefsen, D. (2011). Groups as Rational Sources. En H. B. Schmid, D. Sirtes, y M. Weber (Eds.), Collective Epistemology (pp. 20–11). Ontos-Velag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110322583.11

Tollefsen, D. (2015). Groups as Agents. Polity.

Tuomela, R. (1992). Group beliefs. Synthese, 91(3), 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413570

Tuomela, R. (2007). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001

Tuomela, R., y Miller, K. (1985). We-Intentions and Social Action. Analyse & Kritik, 7(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1985-0102

Winsberg, E. (2018). Philosophy and Climate Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108164290

Wray, K. B. (2001). Collective Belief and Acceptance. Synthese, 129(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013148515033

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.