Adaptive reuse of religious heritage buildings. A case study of the 16th century convent in Miranda de Ebro.

Main Article Content

Authors
David Echeverry
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-148X
Melisa de Castro
Samuel Azasu
Section
Articles
Keywords:
heritage conservation, sustainable urban development, historic preservation, adaptative reuse
Abstract

The adaptive reuse of ecclesiastical heritage buildings is becoming increasingly necessary as religious institutions grapple with declining vocations, financial constraints, and changing societal roles. This study examines the adaptive reuse of a 16th-century convent in Miranda de Ebro, Spain, using a validated evaluative model tailored to religious heritage buildings. The adaptive reuse process involves transforming sacred spaces into venues with new functions while preserving their architectural, historical, and cultural significance. In Spain, where the Catholic Church oversees approximately 80% of protected heritage sites, such interventions are both urgent and complex. The study analyzes the economic, social, cultural, and ecclesiastical factors influencing the feasibility and sustainability of reuse efforts. Key benefits of adaptive reuse include environmental sustainability, economic revitalization, and community engagement, but religious buildings present unique challenges due to their spiritual symbolism, legal protection, and institutional governance. Findings indicate that a hybrid civic-cultural function represents the most viable and respectful reuse option for the convent. The paper concludes with policy recommendations to support culturally sensitive reuse and strengthen cooperation between Church and state authorities. This study contributes to the advancement of adaptive reuse methodologies and offers a replicable framework for scholars and practitioners navigating ecclesiastical heritage redevelopment.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Echeverry, D., de Castro, M., & Azasu, S. (2025). Adaptive reuse of religious heritage buildings.: A case study of the 16th century convent in Miranda de Ebro. Revista Española De Derecho Canónico, 82(198), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.36576.2660-9541.82.155

References

AIGWI, I. E. – EGBELAKIN, T. - INGHAM, J. - PHIPPS, R., A performance-based adaptive reuse framework for underutilised historical buildings, in: Cities, 82 (2018) 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbpa-01-2018-0007.

AMATO, A. – ANDREOLI, M. – ROVAI, M., Adaptive Reuse of a Historic Building by Introducing New Functions: A Scenario Evaluation Based on Participatory MCA Applied to a Former Carthusian Monastery in Tuscany, Italy, in: Sustainability, 13/4 (2021), art. 4, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042335.

ARFA, F. H. – LUBELLI, B. – ZIJLSTRA, H. – QUIST, W., Criteria of “Effectiveness” and Related Aspects in Adaptive Reuse Projects of Heritage Buildings, in: Sustainability, 14/3 (2022), art. 3, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031251.

ARFA. F. H. - ZIJLSTRA H. – LUBELLI, B. – QUIST, W., Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings: From a Literature Review to a Model of Practice, in: The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 13 (2022) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2022.2058551.

BAXTER, P. - JACK, S., Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers, in: The Qualitative Report, 13/4 (2008) 544–559, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573.

BULLEN, P. A. – LOVE, P. E. D., Factors influencing the adaptive re-use of buildings, in: Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 9/1 (2011) 32–46, https://doi.org/10.1108/17260531111121459.

DE GREGORIO, S. - DE VITA, M. - BERARDINIS, P. - PALMERO, L.; RISDONNE, A., Designing the Sustainable Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage to Enhance the Local Context, in: Sustainability, 12 (2020) 9059, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219059.

DEDEU, R., Bienes Culturales de la Iglesia, patrimonio de todos. [online] [ref. 11 April 2019]: https://gabeirasyasociados.com/bienes-culturales-de-la-iglesia-patrimonio-de-todos/.

DIMODUGNO, D., New Perspectives For The Reuse Of Catholic Churches In Europe: From A Common Problem To A Common Good. . [online] [ref. 1 January 2023]: https://iris.unito.it/handle/2318/1906571.

DYSON, K. - MATTHEWS, J. - LOVE, P. E. D., Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: An exploratory study, in: Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6/1 (2016) 44–57, https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2015-0002.

FLYVBJERG, B., Five misunderstandings about case-study research, in: Qualitative Inquiry, 12/2 (2006) 219–245, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.

FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS HERITAGE, Report 2010–2012 (ref. 2012) https://www.frh-europe.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2010-2012-FRH-Activity-report-and-financial-statement.pdf.

ITARD, L. - KLUNDER, G., Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction, in: Building Research and Information, 35/3 (2007) 252–267.

JENSEN, P. A. - MASLESA, E., Value based building renovation – A tool for decision-making and evaluation, in: Building and Environment, 92 (2015) 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.008.

LANGSTON, C. - WONG, F. K. W. - HUI, E. C. M. - SHEN, L. Y., Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong, in: Building and Environment, 43/10 (2008) 1709–1718, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017.

LANZ, F. - PENDLEBURY, J., Adaptive reuse: A critical review, in: The Journal of Architecture, 27/2–3 (2022) 441–462, https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2022.2105381.

LONGHI, A., Redundant religious heritage: From burdensome legacy to plentiful resource, 2023.

MERT, Y., Contribution to sustainable development: Re-development of post-mining brownfields, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 240 (2019) 118212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118212.

MISIRLISOY, D. - GÜNÇE, K., Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach, in: Sustainable Cities and Society, 26 (2016) 91–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.017.

PLEVOETS, B. - CLEEMPOEL, K. V., Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage: Concepts and Cases of an Emerging Discipline, London: Routledge, 2019.

PONTIFICIUM CONSILIUM DE CULTURA, Decommissioning and ecclesial reuse of churches. [online] [ref. 17 December 2018]: http://www.cultura.va/content/dam/cultura/docs/pdf/beniculturali/guidelines.pdf.

REMØY, H. - VAN DER VOORDT, T., Adaptive reuse of office buildings into housing: Opportunities and risks, in: Building Research & Information, 42/3 (2014) 381–390, https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.865922.

SEDOVA, A., Impact analysis on adaptive reuse of obsolete ecclesiastical cultural heritage, in: European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 12 (2022) 11083, https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2022.11083.

SING, M. C. P. - LOVE, P. E. D. - LIU, H. J., Rehabilitation of existing building stock: A system dynamics model to support policy development, in: Cities, 87 (2019) 142–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.09.018.

VAN DER MEULEN, M., Interior conversions: Redesigning the Village Church for Adaptive Reuse, in: IN_BO. Ricerche e Progetti per Il Territorio, La Città e l’architettura, 8/11 (2017), art. 11, https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/6353.