A critique of the Felipe Martínez Marzoa's work About his refusal to talk about the hermeneutic tools

Abstract

Still hesitant, Felipe Martínez Marzoa has stated that his work may have come to an end. This paper examines his public refusal to talk about hermeneutical phenomenology in itself considered, wanting to help warn with it both the crucial need for an autonomous or independent problematization of it, or independent in terms of the texts of the tradition themselves, such as the prejudice that its reception may incur as long as it does not express itself about the relevance and possibility of speaking of "being". To this end will be distinguished and separated both the object to be interpreted, the text, in terms of its own linguistic dimension, as well as the ontological argument itself, which we judge to be the true all or nothing of the exegetical exercise.